Why military units choose BeaverFit for large-scale projects

When a unit needs new infrastructure — a training space, an operational building, or a fully outfitted strength and conditioning environment — the big question often becomes: can we wait in the long and complex military construction pipeline, or is there a faster way to deliver the needed capability now? At BeaverFit we can support either challenge, but we’re experts at partnering with units facing the infrastructure delivery dilemma. While we understand the choice isn’t always up to the unit, what they can influence is how they navigate procurement, how quickly they can put a training environment in place, and how well that environment aligns with mission objectives. Here are five reasons units choose BeaverFit for large-scale training environments — and how those factors typically compare with the MILCON process: DESIGN BeaverFit customers typically receive a minimum of three to four consultations during the design phase — at no cost. In our experience observing MILCON projects, units often participate in only one or two design reviews, typically through their service’s construction management agency (USACE, NAVFAC or AFCEC). FUNDING MILCON funds are congressionally authorized and appropriated – a lengthy and complex process that can take years. Because these funds must align with administration, DoD and congressional priorities, projects may be delayed or deferred if priorities shift. BeaverFit projects are unit-driven and align with commander priorities. They can follow multiple procurement pathways, with our team assisting throughout the approval process to keep things moving forward — we can get you to “yes,” legally and fiscally. BUILD BeaverFit projects average 270 days from receipt of the purchase order, with project managers interfacing directly with customers throughout the entire build. MILCON, by comparison, moves through a multi-stage process with a less predictable timeline, often encountering delays, and with limited avenues for feedback or interfacing with the construction firm. TIME Most MILCON projects commonly take five to seven years, depending on priority and scope. By the time projects are completed, units may have already outgrown the capabilities and capacity of the new facility. BeaverFit projects can be designed, purchased and installed in less than 365 days. In addition to streamlined delivery, solutions are built with expansion in mind and can be semi-permanent or relocatable if necessary. COST MILCON costs depend on the size and scope of the project, with limited negotiation power due to the bidding process. Because of extended timelines, there is a risk of increased costs due to inflation or reprioritization. A recent study showed that MILCON can cost as much as 68% more than similar projects in the private sector. BeaverFit projects can typically be completed within the fiscal year that funds are allocated (depending on purchase cycle). Our team works closely with units to align costs with budgetary constraints, ensuring taxpayer dollars are used efficiently. BOTTOM LINE MILCON will always play a critical role for installations with long-term, large-scale infrastructure needs. But when units require flexibility and timeliness, exploring alternative pathways makes sense. At BeaverFit, our goal is simple: create a unique training environment that enables you to win — with as little friction as possible, and with a delivery plan built around your timeline, not just fiscal-year cycles. Get in touch with us today to discuss what winning looks like for you. Contact BeaverFit Share this… FacebookFacebook Save Twitter